Murdoch seems hell bent on punishing Google for all the free content they’ve ‘robbed’ from him, so much so he’s willing to get into bed with Microsoft’s Steve Ballmer. Ergh.
A few weeks ago TechCrunch revealed that Microsoft and Murdoch held meetings to discuss the potential of giving top publications premium positions in Bing and removing their online editions from appearing in Google’s SERPs.
The News Corp megalomaniac is willing to put up firewalls and stop Google’s spiders from crawling his publications’ websites, including the Financial Times, The Sun and The Times, and have Microsoft pay vast amounts of money in order to have exclusive rights to crawling and returning these sites in their Bing results.
So any publisher that wants to participate in this sort of strategy must make themselve’s invisible to all search engines not taking part. But what implications will this have on the advertising market? And more importantly for us, what does it mean for search marketers? If this deal goes ahead we will have to optimise for Bing far more, and those of us who have publisher clients are going to need extensive knowledge of their algorithm and what the search engine takes into account when ranking websites.
Of course Microsoft are feverishly keen for this partnership to solidify as they need a USP to distinguish Bing from Google, because lets face it, anything Bing can find Google can find better. However Rupe isn’t fully convinced that balding Ballmer even has the money to make up for the loss of traffic that Google’s rankings generate for the newspapers. 
When asked about the deal with Microsoft, Murdoch replied: “I don’t know if they can afford to do that. If they were to pay everybody for everything they took, from every newspaper in the world and every magazine they wouldn’t have any profits left.”
Friday, 11 December 2009
Thursday, 3 December 2009
iPlayer Down, iPlayer Down!
What was this all about?
Midnight last night, rumoured pixel gremlins found their way into the iPlayer to chew through a few links and disrupt the publics on-demand viewing pleasure. The problem was soon rectified but the suspects still remain at large...
Midnight last night, rumoured pixel gremlins found their way into the iPlayer to chew through a few links and disrupt the publics on-demand viewing pleasure. The problem was soon rectified but the suspects still remain at large...
Tuesday, 1 December 2009
Hip Hop Ain’t Dead, It’s Just Emigrated
          Recently Simon Reynolds wrote a piece for your Guardian music blog entitled, “When Will Hip Hop Hurry Up And Die?” Although excellently written, well informed and with some shrewd observation, it infuriated me. No doubt US hip hop warrants analysis but what about the UK UK  publication has a predominantly British-based readership, so surely a critique of the UK 
In mainstream publications, UK 
In 2007 I picked up a Skitz mix tape from a guy selling them on the street in Brighton’s town centre. On this CD was a track by Doc Brown over Nas’s ‘Hip Hop is Dead’ beat. Doc Brown’s re-interpretation included the chorus, “hip hop ain’t dead it’s just emigrated; now it’s in the UK 
On Friday I was blessed enough to catch London Zoo road block the mini venue Micro on Brighton ’s blustery seafront. The group’s primary MC is Dabbla, whose sharp wit and graphic rhymes depict an honest and entertaining picture of life as a London UK 
The UK America UK 
Reynolds even acknowledges the flaws of the current defeatest zeitgeist for “Death of…” pieces but goes on to say “No genre went gently into that good night: they all clung on, cluttering up the musical landscape. This not only made it harder for new things to emerge...” Whereas this might be true for the states, in the UK we’ve had a recent insurgence of energetic dance music like Skream’s dark dubstep, Boy Better Know’s hyper grime and La Roux’s ghetto falsetto synth-pop, all flourishing kid categories from the parental hip hop.
Of course there are break through acts such as Dizzy Rascal, N-Dubs and Tynchy Styder who often get compassionate cover from Observer Music Monthly, and although these pedestal examples certainly earn their place in the hall of fame, the rest of the artists get ignored, or simply dismissed into the homogenous mess of the “hoody” subculture. It would seem that we’d rather regale superficial American juke-box rap than our own grass-roots efforts. There are a few saving graces; it’s rightly so that The Streets’ ‘Original Pirate Material’ should be voted album of the decade, but what about the other DJs, MCs and Producers lurking in Mike Skinners shadow? 
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
